Kenya | |||||
Kenya Wildlife Servicevs Commissioner for Domestic Taxes |
|||||
id : 23-202100  cat : Tax Appeals tribunal-Nairobi   | |||||
The Tribunal having demined that there is a service, the next issue for determination would" be whether and if so, when did the service become taxable? |
|||||
Asked by : Admin
DOF : 06/05/2013 |
|||||
SubmissionsPDF |
|||||
The Appellant filed its Memorandum of Appeal on 6th May 2013 together with their Statement of Facts. The Appellant prayed that the Respondent refrain from charging it tax on conservation fees and sought that the assessment be adjusted, The Appellant also prayed for directions to be provided on clear guidelines on conservation fees and the same be gazetted. The Appellant sought period of at least one year to reorganize their operations so as to Judgement: Tax Appeal No.116 of 2015 Page 1 be in a position to implement the imposition of VAT on conservation fees in the event the Tribunal dismissed their Appeal |
|||||
Ruling |
|||||
The Tribunal having entered a finding that the service provided was not a business and therefore did not attract VAT, the Appellant was well within their right to appeal the decision of the Respondent and consequently, it |
|||||
posted by : Admin
DOR : 16/11/2016 |
|||||