Kenya | |||||
Kapu (K) Limitedvs Commissioner for Domestic Taxes |
|||||
id : 21-202100  cat : Tax Appeals tribunal-Nairobi   | |||||
a. Who is charged with the responsibility to demand and recover tax b. Whether there were deposits for the period 2003 to 2008 which were not declared on the Sales by the Appellant and if so how much and who were the recipients of the deposits; c. Whether the Appellant was involved in concealing of income for purposes of tax avoidance; d. Whether there were any variances in the Appellant's monthly summaries and sales reported on VAT 3 returns; e. What was the assessed tax liability and amount demanded; f. Whether there was multiple accounting of sales; case. Judgement Appeal No.152 of 2015 Page 6 g. What is the correct gross profit margin? h. Whether the Appellant has settled the undisputed outstanding |
|||||
Asked by : Admin
DOF : 08/07/1905 |
|||||
SubmissionsPDF |
|||||
The appellant prays that: The notice dated 1st February 2010 be set aside and annulled for the reason that they fail to disclose the unpaid tax for the specific period and penalties thereon |
|||||
Ruling |
|||||
The Tribunal holds that the Ag. Senior Commissioner Investigation and Enforcement Department acted well within the Respondent's mandate as provided for under Kenya Revenue Act (Cap 469) of the Laws of Kenya and as further provided under Sections 30 and 31 of the Value Added Tax Ca)P 476 (now repealed) to investigate and raise an Assessment and therefore the ground of Appeal that the Ag. Senior Commissioner Investigation and Enforcement Department had no authority to act and raise an assessment must fail. 30. The Tribunal having entered the above findings on the Appeal dismisses the Appeal and upholds the decision of the Commissioner to charge VAT of Kshs.331.678,326.00. Judgement Appeal No.152 of 2015 Page 11 31. The Tribunal holds that there were undeclared sales of Kshs.971, 789,421. 75 giving raise to net chargeable income of Kshs.48,589,471.00 which is the admitted 50/0 of net chargeable income as per the Appellant's Tax Agent's Letter dated 17th August 2011 resulting in Corporation Tax of Kshs.14,576,841.00 being the principle tax payable by the Appellant. 32. % The Tribunal finds that any pending interest of each Party due are payable in accordance with the law Each party shall bear its own costs |
|||||
posted by : Admin
DOR : 07/12/2016 |
|||||