Kenya | |||||
Kal Africa Limitedvs Commissioner for Domestic Taxes |
|||||
id : 20-202100  cat : Tax Appeals tribunal-Nairobi   | |||||
In pursuant to Section 2 of the VAT Act, 2013 a zero-rated supply is defined to mean a supply listed in the Second Schedule to the Act and the institutions which enjoy supply of goods and services that are zero-rated are listed under Part B of the said Second Schedule to the Act. It is not in dispute that the British Army Training Unit in Kenya (BATUK) is not one of the institutions listed as to enjoy zero rated supply under the Part B of the Second Schedule to the VAT Act, 2013. |
|||||
Asked by : Admin
DOF : 08/07/1905 |
|||||
SubmissionsPDF |
|||||
1. Given that the disallowing of the refund arising on account of supplies to the BATUK and charging of VAT on the same are not based on the law, we pray that this Honorable Tribunal sets aside the assessment in this regard amounting to Kshs. 15,244,135/=. |
|||||
Ruling |
|||||
The Tribunal finds in the circumstances that the constructions services rendered by the Appellant to the British Army Training Unit in Kenya (BATUK) in 2014 were chargeable to VAT and the assessment of VAT in respect of the invoices raised by the Appellant to the British Army Training Unit in Kenya (BATUK) for the constructions services rendered in the Respondent's letter dated 3rd June, 2015 was appropriate. The assessed sum of Kshs. 15,244,135/= plus the accrued interest and penalties thereon is payable by the Appellant. The Tribunal upholds the assessment of VAT by the Respondent and accordingly finds that the Appeal has no merit and proceeds to dismiss the same with no order as to costs. |
|||||
posted by : Admin
DOR : 05/09/2016 |
|||||